New Reduced price! API RP 941 View larger

API RP 941

M00042925

New product

API RP 941 Steels for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures in Petroleum Refineries and Petrochemical Plants, Eighth Edition, Includes Errata 1 (2016), Errata 2 (2018), and Addendum 1 (2020)

standard by American Petroleum Institute, 02/01/2016

Full Description

This recommended practice (RP) summarizes the results of experimental tests and actual data acquired from operating plants to establish practical operating limits for carbon and low alloy steels in hydrogen service at elevated temperatures and pressures. The effects on the resistance of steels to hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure that result from high stress, heat treatment, chemical composition, and cladding are discussed. This RP does not address the resistance of steels to hydrogen at lower temperatures [below about 400 F (204 C)], where atomic hydrogen enters the steel as a result of an electrochemical mechanism.

This RP applies to equipment in refineries, petrochemical facilities, and chemical facilities in which hydrogen or hydrogen-containing fluids are processed at elevated temperature and pressure. The guidelines in this RP can also be applied to hydrogenation plants such as those that manufacture ammonia, methanol, edible oils, and higher alcohols.

The steels discussed in this RP resist high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA) when operated within the guidelines given. However, they may not be resistant to other corrosives present in a process stream or to other metallurgical damage mechanisms that can occur in the operating HTHA range. This RP also does not address the issues surrounding possible damage from rapid cooling of the metal after it has been in high temperature, high pressure hydrogen service (e.g. possible need for outgassing hydroprocessing reactors). This RP discusses in detail only the resistance of steels to HTHA.

Presented in this document are curves that indicate the operating limits of temperature and hydrogen partial pressure for satisfactory resistance of carbon steel and Cr-Mo steels to HTHA in elevated temperature hydrogen service. In addition, it includes a summary of inspection methods to evaluate equipment for the existence of HTHA.

More details

In stock

$68.40

-55%

$152.00

More info

941_e8 wE1 E2 A1.fm


Steels for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and

Pressures in Petroleum Refineries

and Petrochemical Plants


API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 941 EIGHTH EDITION, FEBRUARY 2016


ERRATA 1, JUNE 2016

ERRATA 2, JANUARY 2018


ADDENDUM 1, AUGUST 2020




Special Notes


API publications necessarily address problems of a general nature. With respect to particular circumstances, local, state, and federal laws and regulations should be reviewed. The use of API publications is voluntary. In some cases, third parties or authorities having jurisdiction may choose to incorporate API standards by reference and may mandate compliance.


Neither API nor any of API's employees, subcontractors, consultants, committees, or other assignees make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in this publication. Neither API nor any of API's employees, subcontractors, consultants, or other assignees represent that use of this publication would not infringe upon privately owned rights.


API publications may be used by anyone desiring to do so. Every effort has been made by the Institute to assure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in them; however, the Institute makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection with this publication and hereby expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from its use or for the violation of any authorities having jurisdiction with which this publication may conflict.


API publications are published to facilitate the broad availability of proven, sound engineering and operating practices. These publications are not intended to obviate the need for applying sound engineering judgment regarding when and where these publications should be utilized. The formulation and publication of API publications is not intended in any way to inhibit anyone from using any other practices.


Any manufacturer marking equipment or materials in conformance with the marking requirements of an API standard is solely responsible for complying with all the applicable requirements of that standard. API does not represent, warrant, or guarantee that such products do in fact conform to the applicable API standard.


Classified areas may vary depending on the location, conditions, equipment, and substances involved in any given situation. Users of this Recommended Practice should consult with the appropriate authorities having jurisdiction.


Users of this Recommended Practice should not rely exclusively on the information contained in this document. Sound business, scientific, engineering, and safety judgment should be used in employing the information contained herein.


API is not undertaking to meet the duties of employers, manufacturers, or suppliers to warn and properly train and equip their employees, and others exposed, concerning health and safety risks and precautions, nor undertaking their obligations to comply with authorities having jurisdiction.


Information concerning safety and health risks and proper precautions with respect to particular materials and conditions should be obtained from the employer, the manufacturer or supplier of that material, or the material safety data sheet.


Where applicable, authorities having jurisdiction should be consulted.


Work sites and equipment operations may differ. Users are solely responsible for assessing their specific equipment and premises in determining the appropriateness of applying the Recommended Practice. At all times users should employ sound business, scientific, engineering, and judgment safety when using this Recommended Practice.


All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Contact the Publisher, API Publishing Services, 200 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001.


Copyright © 2020 American Petroleum Institute


Foreword


Nothing contained in any API publication is to be construed as granting any right, by implication or otherwise, for the manufacture, sale, or use of any method, apparatus, or product covered by letters patent. Neither should anything contained in the publication be construed as insuring anyone against liability for infringement of letters patent.


Shall: As used in a standard, “shall” denotes a minimum requirement in order to conform to the specification.


Should: As used in a standard, “should” denotes a recommendation or that which is advised but not required in order to conform to the specification.


May: As used in a standard, "may" denotes a course of action permissible within the limits of a standard. Can: As used in a standard, "can" denotes a statement of possibility or capability.

This document was produced under API standardization procedures that ensure appropriate notification and participation in the developmental process and is designated as an API standard. Questions concerning the interpretation of the content of this publication or comments and questions concerning the procedures under which this publication was developed should be directed in writing to the Director of Standards, American Petroleum Institute, 200 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of the material published herein should also be addressed to the director.


Generally, API standards are reviewed and revised, reaffirmed, or withdrawn at least every five years. A one-time extension of up to two years may be added to this review cycle. Status of the publication can be ascertained from the API Standards Department, telephone (202) 682-8000. A catalog of API publications and materials is published annually by API, 200 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001.


Suggested revisions are invited and should be submitted to the Standards Department, API, 200 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001, standards@api.org.


iii


Contents


Page

  1. Scope 1

  2. Normative References 1

  3. Operating Experience 2

    1. Basis for Setting Integrity Operating Windows 2

    2. Selecting Materials for New Equipment 2

    3. High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) in a Liquid Hydrocarbon Phase 4

    4. Base Material for Refractory-lined Equipment or Piping 4

    5. References and Comments for Figure 1 4

  4. Forms of HTHA 7

    1. General 7

    2. Surface Decarburization 8

    3. Internal Decarburization, Fissuring, and Cracking 8

  5. Factors Influencing Internal Decarburization, Fissuring, and Cracking Caused by HTHA 9

    1. Incubation Time 9

    2. Effect of Primary Stresses 11

    3. Effect of Secondary Stresses 11

    4. Effect of Heat Treatment 11

    5. Effect of Stainless Steel Cladding or Weld Overlay 12

  6. Inspection for HTHA 13

Annex A (informative) HTHA of 0.5Mo Steels 15

Annex B (informative) HTHA of 1.25 Cr-0.5Mo Steel 25

Annex C (informative) HTHA of 2.25Cr-1Mo Steel 27

Annex D (informative) Effective Pressures of Hydrogen in Steel Covered by Clad/Overlay 29

Annex E (informative) Summary of Inspection Methods 30

Annex F (informative) HTHA of Non-PWHT’d Carbon Steels 34

Annex G (informative) Methodology for Calculating Hydrogen Partial Pressure in Liquid-filled Piping 37

Annex H (informative) Internal Company Data Collection—Request for New Information 41

Bibliography 43

Figures

  1. Operating Limits for Steels in Hydrogen Service to Avoid High Temperature Hydrogen Attack 3

  2. C-0.5Mo Steel (ASTM A204 Grade A) Showing Internal Decarburization and Fissuring in

    High Temperature Hydrogen Service 9

  3. Incubation Time for High Temperature Hydrogen Attack Damage of Carbon Steel (Non-welded

or Welded with Postweld Heat Treatment) in High Temperature Hydrogen Service 10

    1. Experience with C-0.5Mo and Mn-0.5Mo Steel in High Temperature Hydrogen Service 16

    2. Steels in High Temperature Hydrogen Service Showing Effect of Molybdenum and Trace

      Alloying Elements 22

      v

      Contents

    3. Incubation Time for High Temperature Hydrogen Attack Damage of 0.5Mo Steels in High

Page

Temperature Hydrogen Service 23

B.1 Operating Conditions for 1.25Cr-0.5Mo Steels That Experienced High Temperature Hydrogen

Attack Below the Figure 1 Curve 26

C.1 Operating Conditions of 2.25Cr-1Mo Steels That Experienced High Temperature Hydrogen Attack

Below the Figure 1 Curve 28

    1. HTHA Volumetric Damage Manifestation 33

    2. HTHA Blister Damage Manifestation 33

    3. HTHA Crack-like Flaw Damage Manifestation 34

    4. HTHA Combination of Volumetric, Blister, and Crack-like Flaw Damage Manifestation. 35

F.1 Operating Conditions for Carbon Steel (Welded with No PWHT) That Experienced HTHA Below

the 1977 Carbon Steel Figure 1 Curve 35

    1. Sketch for Example 1 39

    2. Sketch for Example 2 40


Tables

    1. Operating Conditions for C-0.5Mo Steels That Experienced High Temperature Hydrogen Attack

      Below the 0.5Mo Steel Curve in Figure A.1 21

    2. References Along with Chromium, Molybdenum, Vanadium and Molybdenum Equivalent

Values for Figure A.2 24

B.1 Experience with HTHA of 1.25Cr-0.5Mo Steel at Operating Conditions Below the Figure 1 Curve 25

C.1 Experience with High Temperature Hydrogen Attack of 2.25Cr-1Mo Steel at Operating

Conditions Below the Figure 1 Curve 27

E.1a Ultrasonic Techniques (Recommended) 35

E.1b Historic Ultrasonic Techniques for Detection and Sizing 36

E.1c Historic Ultrasonic Techniques for Characterization 36

    1. Non-ultrasonic NDT Methods for HTHA 37

    2. Example for FMC/PAUT/TOFD Reporting Table 38

    3. Metallurgical Validation Methods for HTHA 43

    1. Effective Hydrogen Partial Pressures 39

    2. Effective Hydrogen Partial Pressures with the Composition Variation + Compensation Method 40


vi


Introduction


At normal atmospheric temperatures, gaseous molecular hydrogen does not readily permeate steel, even at high pressures. Carbon steel is the standard material for cylinders that are used to transport hydrogen at pressures of 2000 psi (14 MPa). Many postweld heat treated carbon steel pressure vessels have been used successfully in continuous service at pressures up to 10,000 psi (69 MPa) and temperatures up to 430 °F (221 °C). However, under these same conditions, highly stressed carbon steels and hardened steels have cracked due to hydrogen embrittlement.


The recommended maximum hydrogen partial pressure at atmospheric temperature for carbon steel fabricated in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code is 13,000 psia (90 MPa). Below this pressure, carbon steel equipment has shown satisfactory performance. Above this pressure, very little operating and experimental data are available. If plants are to operate at hydrogen partial pressures that exceed 13,000 psia (90 MPa), the use of an austenitic stainless steel liner with venting in the shell should be considered.


At elevated temperatures, molecular hydrogen dissociates into the atomic form, which can readily enter and diffuse through the steel. Under these conditions, the diffusion of hydrogen in steel is more rapid. As discussed in Section 4, hydrogen reacts with the carbon in the steel to cause either surface decarburization or internal decarburization and fissuring, and eventual cracking. This form of hydrogen damage is called high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA), and this recommended practice discusses the resistance of steels to HTHA.


vii


Steels for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures in Petroleum Refineries and Petrochemical Plants


  1. Scope

    This recommended practice (RP) summarizes the results of experimental tests and actual data acquired from operating plants to establish practical operating limits for carbon and low alloy steels in hydrogen service at elevated temperatures and pressures. The effects on the resistance of steels to hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure that result from high stress, heat treatment, chemical composition, and cladding are discussed. This RP does not address the resistance of steels to hydrogen at lower temperatures [below about 400 °F (204 °C)], where atomic hydrogen enters the steel as a result of an electrochemical mechanism.


    This RP applies to equipment in refineries, petrochemical facilities, and chemical facilities in which hydrogen or hydrogen-containing fluids are processed at elevated temperature and pressure. The guidelines in this RP can also be applied to hydrogenation plants such as those that manufacture ammonia, methanol, edible oils, and higher alcohols.


    The steels discussed in this RP resist high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA) when operated within the guidelines given. However, they may not be resistant to other corrosives present in a process stream or to other metallurgical damage mechanisms that can occur in the operating HTHA range. This RP also does not address the issues surrounding possible damage from rapid cooling of the metal after it has been in high temperature, high pressure hydrogen service (e.g. possible need for outgassing hydroprocessing reactors). This RP discusses in detail only the resistance of steels to HTHA.


    Presented in this document are curves that indicate the operating limits of temperature and hydrogen partial pressure for satisfactory resistance of carbon steel and Cr-Mo steels to HTHA in elevated temperature hydrogen service. In addition, it includes a summary of inspection methods to evaluate equipment for the existence of HTHA.


  2. Normative References

The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any addenda) applies.


API 510, Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-Service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration


API 570, Piping Inspection Code: In-Service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration of Piping Systems


API Recommended Practice 584, Integrity Operating Windows


ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) 1, Section VIII: Pressure Vessels; Division 1 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), Section VIII: Pressure Vessels; Division 2 ASME/ANSI 2 Code for Pressure Piping B31.3, Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping AWS D10.10/D10.10M 3, Recommended Practices for Local Heating of Welds in Piping and Tubing WRC Bul-452 4, Recommended Practices for Local Heating of Welds in Pressure Vessels


  1. ASME International, 2 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10016-5990, www.asme.org.

  2. American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10036, www.ansi.org.

  3. American Welding Society, 8669 NW 36 Street, # 130, Miami, Florida 33166-6672, www.aws.org

  4. Welding Research Council, P.O. Box 201547, Shaker Heights, Ohio 44122, www.forengineers.org


1