New Reduced price! API MPMS Chapter 19.6.1 View larger

API MPMS Chapter 19.6.1

M00042818

New product

API MPMS Chapter 19.6.1 Evaporative Loss from Storage Tank Floating-roof Landings, First Edition

Handbook / Manual / Guide by American Petroleum Institute, 02/01/2017

Full Description

Investigates storage tank emissions that may result from landing and subsequently refloating a floating roof.

The existing emission factors for floating-roof tanks are based on the assumption that the floating roof is continuously floating on the stored stock liquid.

Additional emissions may occur, however, if the tank is emptied such that the floating roof is no longer floating. This study sought to quantify these floating-roof landing loss emissions.

More details

In stock

$61.20

-55%

$136.00

More info

2012 API Word Template


Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards Chapter 19.6

Part 1—Evaporative Loss from Storage Tank Floating-roof Landings


FIRST EDITION, FEBRUARY 2017





Special Notes


API publications necessarily address problems of a general nature. With respect to particular circumstances, local, state, and federal laws and regulations should be reviewed.


Neither API nor any of API’s employees, subcontractors, consultants, committees, or other assignees make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in this publication. Neither API nor any of API’s employees, subcontractors, consultants, or other assignees represent that use of this publication would not infringe upon privately owned rights.


API publications may be used by anyone desiring to do so. Every effort has been made by the Institute to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in them; however, the Institute makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection with this publication and hereby expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from its use or for the violation of any authorities having jurisdiction with which this publication may conflict.


API publications are published to facilitate the broad availability of proven, sound engineering and operating practices. These publications are not intended to obviate the need for applying sound engineering judgment regarding when and where these publications should be utilized. The formulation and publication of API publications is not intended in any way to inhibit anyone from using any other practices.


Any manufacturer marking equipment or materials in conformance with the marking requirements of an API standard is solely responsible for complying with all the applicable requirements of that standard. API does not represent, warrant, or guarantee that such products do in fact conform to the applicable API standard.


All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Contact the Publisher, API Publishing Services, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.


Copyright © 2017 American Petroleum Institute


Foreword


Nothing contained in any API publication is to be construed as granting any right, by implication or otherwise, for the manufacture, sale, or use of any method, apparatus, or product covered by letters patent. Neither should anything contained in the publication be construed as insuring anyone against liability for infringement of letters patent.


Shall: As used in a standard, “shall” denotes a minimum requirement in order to conform to the specification.


Should: As used in a standard, “should” denotes a recommendation or that which is advised but not required in order to conform to the specification.


May: As used in a standard, “may” denotes a course of action permissible within the limits of a standard. Can: As used in a standard, “can” denotes a statement of possibility or capability.

This document was produced under API standardization procedures that ensure appropriate notification and participation in the developmental process and is designated as an API standard. Questions concerning the interpretation of the content of this publication or comments and questions concerning the procedures under which this publication was developed should be directed in writing to the Director of Standards, American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of the material published herein should also be addressed to the director.


Generally, API standards are reviewed and revised, reaffirmed, or withdrawn at least every five years. A one-time extension of up to two years may be added to this review cycle. Status of the publication can be ascertained from the API Standards Department, telephone (202) 682-8000. A catalog of API publications and materials is published annually by API, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.


Suggested revisions are invited and should be submitted to the Standards Department, API, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005, standards@api.org.


iii


Contents


Page

  1. Scope 1

  2. Normative References 1

  3. Variables and Symbols 1

  4. Proposed Estimating Methods 3

    1. General 3

    2. Standing Idle Loss 3

    3. Filling Loss 4

    4. Total Landing Loss 4

    5. Landing Loss Estimation Equations 4

  5. Description of Concentration and Saturation 10

  6. Description of Floating-roof Landing Losses 10

    1. Landing Loss Events 10

    2. Standing Idle Loss Mechanisms 11

    3. Filling Loss Mechanism 20

    4. Properties of the Liquid Heel 24

  7. Sample Calculations 24

    1. Accounting for Cone-down Bottoms 24

    2. Worked Examples 27

  8. Conclusion 27

Annex A (informative) Summary of the Investigations 29

Annex B (informative) Examples 31

Bibliography 37

Figures

  1. Vacuum-breaker Vent 7

  2. Standing Idle Loss (Emissions) 8

  3. Filling Loss (Emissions) 8

  4. Tank with a Liquid Heel 9

  5. Drain-dry Tank 9

  6. Wind Action 15

  7. Wind Effects 16

  8. Saturation Pattern of Drain-dry Tanks versus Tanks with a Liquid Heel 19

  9. Volume of Vapor Above a Liquid Heel 25

  10. Volume of Vapor in a Cone-down Bottom 25

  11. Saturation Factors: Internal Floating-roof Tanks 28

Tables

  1. Summary of Floating-roof Landing Loss Estimation Methods by Tank Type (per Episode) 5

  2. Properties of Selected Petroleum Stocks 6

  3. Effective Height of Liquid, hle, and Height of Vapor Space, hv 26


v


Introduction


The purpose of this study was to investigate storage tank emissions that may result from landing and subsequently refloating a floating roof. The existing emission factors for floating-roof tanks [2],[22] are based on the assumption that the floating roof is continuously floating on the stored stock liquid. Additional emissions may occur, however, if the tank is emptied such that the floating roof is no longer floating.


When the liquid level approaches the bottom of the tank, the floating roof lands on deck legs or other supports that prevent it from dropping any further as the stock liquid continues to be removed. Further withdrawal of stock liquid could then potentially form a partial vacuum beneath the landed floating roof. If the receding liquid were to create an excessive partial vacuum, the floating roof could collapse. To avoid this condition, a vacuum-breaker vent on the floating roof opens automatically as the floating roof lands (see Figure 1). The vapor space created under the floating roof is thereby freely vented to the space above the floating roof. Even in the case of a self-closing vacuum-breaker, the vapor space beneath the floating roof is vented via the other deck fittings and the rim seal, which is effectively rendered vapor mounted once the liquid level drops below the bottom of the rim seal.


Vapor loss (and the corresponding emissions to the atmosphere) may occur while the tank remains nominally empty and the floating roof continues to stand idle in this landed condition (see Figure 2). Additional emissions may occur during the refilling of the tank, as the vapor space beneath the floating roof is displaced by the incoming stock liquid (see Figure 3). This study sought to quantify these floating-roof landing loss emissions.



vi

Evaporative Loss from Storage Tank Floating-roof Landings


  1. Scope

    The emissions characterized as floating-roof landing losses in this study are those that would be expected to occur if a floating roof is landed in the course of normal operations and subsequently refilled. This study does not address emissions that may result from additional activities, such as degassing or tank cleaning, that may occur while the tank is empty.


    The model is intended for use with any petroleum liquid. The inclusion in the model of the stock liquid’s physical properties (i.e. true vapor pressure, vapor molecular weight, and liquid density) appears to effectively differentiate crude oil from gasoline, and therefore no further differentiation was made in the form of product factors or other product-specific adjustments.


    The model does not directly address standing idle losses for partial days, but it would be reasonable to estimate the emissions for a partial day by estimating the standing idle emissions for a single day and then prorating that estimate by the number of hours that the floating roof was actually landed.


    Any emission factor is properly understood as representative of the actual emission rates that are typical for a population of emission points. For a non-uniform population, however, there is an inherent level of uncertainty associated with the application of the general emission factor to any individual emission point. Some of the critical sources of uncertainty in this model of floating-roof landing losses are addressed in the comments on the confidence associated with each step of the model. As noted in these comments, some of the variables have not been well defined, and the values shown are intended to serve only as placeholders—pending further research.


  2. Normative References

    The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.


    API MPMS Chapter 19.1, Evaporative Loss from Fixed-roof Tanks


    API MPMS Chapter 19.2, Evaporative Loss from Floating-roof Tanks


    API MPMS Chapter 19.4, Evaporative Loss Reference Information and Speciation Methodology


    API MPMS Chapter 19.5/EI Hydrocarbon Management HM 65 1, Atmospheric Hydrocarbon Emissions from Marine Vessel Transfer Operations


    API Technical Report 2568, Evaporative Loss from the Cleaning of Storage Tanks


  3. Variables and Symbols


Symbol

Description

Units

Source

B

constant from Antoine’s equation

°R

from Table 2 (for historical purposes only)

Csf

filling saturation correction factor

dimensionless

[Equation (19)  Equation (5)]

 1  (29)

[Equation (5)  Equation (25)]



1 Energy Institute, 61 New Cavendish Street, London W1G 7AR, UK, www.energyinst.org.

1