New Reduced price! API TR 934-F Part 2 View larger

API TR 934-F Part 2

M00042736

New product

API TR 934-F Part 2 Literature Review of Fracture Mechanics-based Experimental Data for Internal Hydrogen-assisted Cracking of Vanadium-modified 21/4Cr-Mo Steel, First Edition

standard by American Petroleum Institute, 08/01/2017

Full Description

This technical report documents a critical assessment of the existing literature on IHAC of V-modified Cr-Mo steels for use in interpreting the results of the present laboratory work, so as to establish a definitive characterization of the H cracking resistance of this steel class.

Since these modern Cr-Mo-V steels are of relatively high purity, and thus retain a low FATT after laboratory simulation of in-service temper embrittlement, the data base for 2Cr-1Mo shown in Figure 1 provides a context for assessment of the IHAC performance of V-modified grades. Hydrogen cracking of less-pure V-modified Cr-Mo steels was not considered in this review.

The content of this technical report is chronologically organized into initial and more modern works, as justified by improvement in test execution, data analysis, and reporting, as well as the evolution from laboratory to commercial scale heats of Cr-Mo-V.

More details

In stock

$60.75

-55%

$135.00

More info

oenu4emy


Literature Review of Fracture Mechanics–based Experimental Data for Internal Hydrogen-assisted Cracking of Vanadium-modified 2¼Cr-1Mo Steel


API TECHNICAL REPORT 934-F, PART 2 FIRST EDITION, AUGUST 2017




Literature Review of Fracture Mechanics–based Experimental Data for Internal Hydrogen-assisted Cracking of Vanadium-modified 2¼Cr-1Mo Steel


Downstream Segment


API TECHNICAL REPORT 934-F, PART 2 FIRST EDITION, AUGUST 2017

Prepared under contract for API by: Dr. Richard P. Gangloff

Emeritus Ferman W. Perry Professor of Materials Science and Engineering Department of Materials Science and Engineering

School of Engineering and Applied Science

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904-4745





Special Notes


API publications necessarily address problems of a general nature. With respect to particular circumstances, local, state, and federal laws and regulations should be reviewed.


Neither API nor any of API’s employees, subcontractors, consultants, or other assignees make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or utility of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in this publication, or represent that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights.


Classified areas may vary depending on the location, conditions, equipment, and substances involved in any given situation. Users of this Technical Report should consult with the appropriate authorities having jurisdiction.


API publications may be used by anyone desiring to do so. Every effort has been made by the Institute to assure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in them; however, the Institute makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection with this publication and hereby expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from its use or for the violation of any authorities having jurisdiction with which this publication may conflict.


API publications are published to facilitate the broad availability of proven, sound engineering and operating practices. These publications are not intended to obviate the need for applying sound engineering judgment regarding when and where these publications should be utilized. The formulation and publication of API publications is not intended in any way to inhibit anyone from using any other practices.


Any manufacturer marking equipment or materials in conformance with the marking requirements of an API standard is solely responsible for complying with all the applicable requirements of that standard. API does not represent, warrant, or guarantee that such products do in fact conform to the applicable API standard.


API is not undertaking to meet the duties of employers, manufacturers, or suppliers to warn and properly train and equip their employees, and others exposed, concerning health and safety risks and precautions, nor undertaking their obligations to comply with authorities having jurisdiction.


Users of this Technical Report should not rely exclusively on the information contained in this document. Sound business, scientific, engineering, and safety judgment should be used in employing the information contained herein.


All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Contact the Publisher, API Publishing Services, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.


Copyright © 2017 American Petroleum Institute


Foreword


Nothing contained in any API publication is to be construed as granting any right, by implication or otherwise, for the manufacture, sale, or use of any method, apparatus, or product covered by letters patent. Neither should anything contained in the publication be construed as insuring anyone against liability for infringement of letters patent.


Questions concerning the interpretation of the content of this publication or comments and questions concerning the procedures under which this publication was developed should be directed in writing to the Director of Standards, American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of the material published herein should also be addressed to the director.


Generally, API standards are reviewed and revised, reaffirmed, or withdrawn at least every five years. A one-time extension of up to two years may be added to this review cycle. Status of the publication can be ascertained from the API Standards Department, telephone (202) 682-8000. A catalog of API publications and materials is published annually by API, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.


Suggested revisions are invited and should be submitted to the Standards Department, API, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005, standards@api.org.


iii


Contents


Page

  1. Background 1

  2. Results 3

    1. Initial Experimentation; 1985–2000 3

    2. Improved Experimental Characterization of IHAC; 2000–present 18

    3. Hydrogen Solubility, Diffusivity, and Trapping in V-modified Cr-Mo Steel 26

    4. Hydrogen Embrittlement of Cr-Mo and Cr-Mo-V Steels in H2 27

    5. Conclusions 32

Bibliography 34


v


Executive Summary


Literature data collectively suggest that V-modified 2¼Cr-1Mo base plate and weld metal each exhibit improved resistance to Internal Hydrogen-assisted Cracking (IHAC) compared to modern 2¼Cr-1Mo steel, where each steel is typified by modern-low J-factor or low XB, and thus minimal temper embrittlement. IHAC in petrochemical applications typically involves H charging of the steel during elevated temperature exposure in high-pressure H2, followed by stressing at near-ambient temperatures. For V-modified Cr-Mo, the slow-rising-displacement threshold stress intensity (KIH) is a significant fraction of the H-free plane strain fracture toughness; however, V-modified steels are not immune to IHAC for this conservatively aggressive loading mode. This good IHAC resistance is attributed to beneficial H interaction with nano-scale vanadium carbide trap sites, but the details of this complex H trapping behavior are neither quantified nor fully understood.


No single study of IHAC in 2¼Cr-1Mo-0.25V base plate or weld metal is sufficiently comprehensive and quantitative to support fracture-mechanics modeling of pressure vessel fitness for service or a minimum pressurization temperature. Uncertainties in the existing data base are associated with:


  1. the challenge in detecting KIH in the midst of substantial crack tip plastic deformation;


  2. slow crack growth rates typical of reversible H-trap interaction;


  3. the lack of experimental results for very slow loading rates, weld metal, and stressing temperatures from -25 °C to 200 °C;


  4. demonstration of H retention during an IHAC experiment;


  5. lack of understanding of the fundamental mechanism by which H trapping at VXCY precipitates reduces susceptibility to IHAC; and


  6. the effect of low-temperature H charging.


All KIH data for conventional and V-modified Cr-Mo steel reflect H charging followed by rising-displacement loading in moist air. A novel-deleterious interaction of IHAC and Hydrogen Environment-assisted Cracking (HEAC) for stressing of H precharged specimens in H2 may occur, but is not supported by sufficient published data for Cr-Mo and Cr-Mo-V steels. H precharging, with stressing in moist air, or stressing in high-pressure H2, without H precharging, are both capable of producing substantial H embrittlement in conventional Cr-Mo steel. Preliminary data show that V-modified Cr-Mo (without H precharging) is susceptible to HEAC in high-pressure H2, conforming with the behavior of other low- to moderate-strength alloy steels, and apparently less affected by H trapping at vanadium carbides. KIH values for uncharged 2¼Cr-1Mo-0.25V base plate stressed in high-pressure H2 are substantially less than the thresholds typical of IHAC. The HEAC susceptibility of V-modified Cr-Mo should be considered in pressure vessel fitness-for- service modeling.


The ongoing laboratory study, commissioned by API Task Group 934F on Heavy Wall Pressure Vessel MPT, is addressing these uncertainties for 2¼Cr-1Mo-0.25V weld metal and base plate. Literature results obtained after about 2002 are sufficiently accurate and detailed to provide important comparisons with these newly emerging laboratory data. The result will be a strong characterization of the IHAC susceptibility of V-modified Cr-Mo steels.


Literature Review of Fracture Mechanics–based Experimental Data for Internal Hydrogen-assisted Cracking of Vanadium-modified 21/4Cr-1Mo Steel


1 Background


Between 1980 and 1990, researchers in Japan, France, and the United States determined that bainitic 2¼Cr-1Mo steels (UNS K21590) exhibited unexpectedly low-threshold K stress intensity levels (KIH) for the onset of Internal Hydrogen Assisted Cracking (IHAC). Much of this work was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute and the Materials Properties Council (MPC). Such cracking was observed for compact tension specimens that were fatigue precracked, precharged with atomic hydrogen (H) through elevated temperature exposure in high pressure H2, and stressed under slow-rising crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD). The threshold for IHAC under static displacement loading was very high, as is expected for this moderate-strength steel.


While this class of Cr-Mo pressure vessel steels is clearly susceptible to significant IHAC under these conditions, initial data were uncertain for several reasons:


  • lack of a standardized experimental method;


  • detection of the onset of crack growth during rising CMOD was not rigorous;


  • plasticity during loading complicated crack-growth detection and elastic stress intensity factor analysis;


  • variables including actual loading rate in terms of dK/dt and H loss during testing were either not controlled or not reported;


  • high variability in KIH measurement both for a single laboratory and across groups;


  • the mechanism for the deleterious effect of rising CMOD on IHAC was not elucidated; and


  • much of this work was presented as hard copy associated with API-MPC committee presentations, or in conference proceedings, and was not published in peer-reviewed journals.


Between 1994 and 2000, a joint industry program (JIP) was conducted, including five laboratories in Japan, France, and the United States, to develop a rigorous-standard test method for measurement of KIH, as well as crack-growth rate (da/dt) versus elastic-plastic stress intensity (KJ) and the threshold for the arrest of IHAC (KTH) [1,2]. This method was then applied to develop a strong data base for IHAC of 12 heats of 2¼Cr-1Mo base plate and weld metal, with impurity composition (and degree of temper embrittlement) being a primary variable, as well as retained H concentration and applied dK/dt [2]. Figure 1 provides a collection of results from this work, plotted as KIH versus total-dissolved H concentration for several low- impurity (J-factor < 100 wt pct) and thus low-Fracture Appearance Transition Temperature (FATT) (FATT <

-28oC) heats of 2¼Cr-1Mo base plate and weld metal [3]. All experiments were conducted at 23 °C, with

25.4 mm-thick standard compact tension specimens precharged in H2 at several combinations of elevated temperature and H2 pressure. Results for the high-purity Phase I steels are shown by filled diamonds with the associated trend line [3]. Open and filled circles and triangles represent older literature data for a 2¼Cr- 1Mo base plate that was not temper embrittled (J and FATT were not published, but are very likely low). The ultimate tensile strength of these steels was between 585 MPa and 605 MPa. The solid-to-dashed line shows the Phase I REACT software algorithm used to describe the H concentration dependence of KIH for high-purity/low-FATT steels [2].


The severity of IHAC for this class of Cr-Mo steels is apparent in Figure 1, considering that the plane strain fracture toughness for this class of steels is of order 300 MPam at 23 °C. From 2002 through 2008, Phase II of this JIP centered on measurement and modeling of the effect of temperature on IHAC in 2¼Cr-1Mo base plate and weld metal, and a fracture mechanics–based method was developed to predict the

2 API TECHNICAL REPORT 934-F, PART 2


minimum pressurization temperature based on IHAC under rising displacement [3,4]. This analysis augments determination of MPT governed by other important failure modes, including H-sensitive unstable fracture [5-7].


160.0


(MPam)

140.0


KIH

120.0


Threshold Stress Intensity Factor,

100.0


80.0


60.0


40.0


20.0


0.0

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Total Hydrogen Concentration , CTH-Total ( wppm)


Figure 1 (after Gangloff [3])


In the early 1980s, in parallel with this focus on IHAC of Cr-Mo, vanadium-modified Cr-Mo steels were developed for heavy wall hydrocracking reactor applications [8,9]. The microstructure was almost always bainitic. The presence of homogeneously precipitated, nano-scale vanadium carbides (VC and V4C3) was hypothesized to greatly reduce the mobility of H through strong-reversible or even irreversible trapping, with the result being reduced susceptibility to IHAC. Fracture mechanics–based data were presented to characterize the IHAC performance of two primary compositions: 2¼Cr-1Mo-0.25V-0.035Nb-0.13C (UNS K31835, minimum yield strength (YS) = 415 MPa, and minimum ultimate tensile strength (UTS) = 585 MPa) and 3Cr-1Mo-0.25V-0.035Nb-0.13C-(Ti,B) (UNS K31830, minimum YS = 415 MPa and minimum

UTS = 585 MPa).


These V-modified steels exhibited better resistance to IHAC under slow-rising CMOD compared to conventional Cr-Mo steel. However, these data are not sufficient to quantify the IHAC resistance of these steels because:


  1. the issues noted above for 2¼Cr-1Mo are equally relevant to V-modified steels;


  2. reduced H mobility likely reduces da/dt, which further complicates time-dependent experimental measurements relevant to long-term IHAC behavior;


  3. the temperature dependence of IHAC depends on H trapping and may differ for the V-modified grades, and was not reported; and


  4. small laboratory heats were used for a portion of the early laboratory experiments.


Given these uncertainties, API Task Group 934-F on Heavy Wall Pressure Vessel MPT commissioned a laboratory study of the IHAC resistance of modern 2¼Cr-1Mo-0.25V-0.035Nb-0.13C. The objective of this program is to employ the JIP-developed standard method to quantify the IHAC resistance of precracked specimens of modern 2¼Cr-1Mo-¼V base plate and weld metal. Particular emphasis is placed on