New Reduced price! API RP 578 View larger

API RP 578

M00042672

New product

API RP 578 Material Verification Program for New and Existing Alloy Piping Systems, Third Edition

standard by American Petroleum Institute, 02/01/2018

Full Description

The purpose of this recommended practice (RP) is to provide the guidelines for the owner/user to develop and implement a material verification program (MVP) as part of an asset integrity program. The MVP uses positive material identification and other methods to verify that the nominal composition of an asset, an asset component, or weldment within the pressure envelope is consistent with the selected or specified construction materials.

A well-designed and implemented MVP is an important management system used to minimize the potential for the release of hazardous substances due to nonconforming materials of construction.

This RP provides the guidelines for material verification programs involving ferrous and nonferrous alloys during the construction, installation, maintenance, and inspection of new and existing process equipment. This RP applies to metallic materials purchased for use either directly by the owner/user or indirectly through distributors, fabricators, or contractors, and includes the supply, fabrication, and installation of these materials.

This RP applies to all refining and petrochemical industries, and may be applied in other industries and/or businesses at the discretion of the owner/user. It is intended to be applied by any owner/user wishing to verify and/or validate that the materials of construction received, fabricated, and/or installed are in accordance with material and/or company specification(s).

More details

In stock

$102.15

-55%

$227.00

More info

a4khnltg


Guidelines for a Material Verification Program (MVP) for New and Existing Assets


API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 578 THIRD EDITION, FEBRUARY 2018




Special Notes


API publications necessarily address problems of a general nature. With respect to particular circumstances, local, state, and federal laws and regulations should be reviewed.


Neither API nor any of API's employees, subcontractors, consultants, committees, or other assignees make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in this publication. Neither API nor any of API’s employees, subcontractors, consultants, or other assignees represent that use of this publication would not infringe upon privately owned rights.


API publications may be used by anyone desiring to do so. Every effort has been made by the Institute to assure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in them; however, the Institute makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection with this publication and hereby expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from its use or for the violation of any authorities having jurisdiction with which this publication may conflict.


API publications are published to facilitate the broad availability of proven, sound engineering and operating practices. These publications are not intended to obviate the need for applying sound engineering judgment regarding when and where these publications should be utilized. The formulation and publication of API publications is not intended in any way to inhibit anyone from using any other practices.


Any manufacturer marking equipment or materials in conformance with the marking requirements of an API standard is solely responsible for complying with all the applicable requirements of that standard. API does not represent, warrant, or guarantee that such products do in fact conform to the applicable API standard.


Classified areas may vary depending on the location, conditions, equipment, and substances involved in any given situation. Users of this recommended practice should consult with the appropriate authorities having jurisdiction.


Users of this recommended practice should not rely exclusively on the information contained in this document. Sound business, scientific, engineering, and safety judgment should be used in employing the information contained herein.


API is not undertaking the meet the duties of employers, manufacturers, or suppliers to warn and properly train and equip their employees, and others exposed, concerning health and safety risks and precautions, nor undertaking their obligations to comply with authorities having jurisdiction.


Information concerning safety and health risks and proper precautions with respect to particular materials and conditions should be obtained from the employer, the manufacturer, or supplier of that material, or the material safety data sheet.


Work sites and equipment operations may differ. Users are solely responsible for assessing their specific equipment and premises in determining the appropriateness of applying the recommended practice. At all times users should employ sound business, scientific, engineering, and judgment safety when using this recommended practice.


All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Contact the Publisher, API Publishing Services, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.


Copyright © 2018 American Petroleum Institute


Foreword


Nothing contained in any API publication is to be construed as granting any right, by implication or otherwise, for the manufacture, sale, or use of any method, apparatus, or product covered by letters patent. Neither should anything contained in the publication be construed as insuring anyone against liability for infringement of letters patents.


Shall: As used in a standard, “shall” denotes a minimum requirement in order to conform to the specification.


Should: As used in a standard, “should” denotes a recommendation or that which is advised but not required in order to conform to the specification.


May: As used in a standard, “may” denotes a course of action permissible within the limits of a standard. Can: As used in a standard, “can” denotes a statement of possibility or capability.

This document was produced under API standardization procedures that ensure appropriate notification and participation in the developmental process and is designated as an API standard. Questions concerning the interpretation of the content of this publication or comments and questions concerning the procedures under which this publication was developed should be directed in writing to the Director of Standards, American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of the material published herein should also be addressed to the director.


Generally, API standards are reviewed and revised, reaffirmed, or withdrawn at least every five years. A one-time extension of up to two years may be added to this review cycle. Status of the publication can be ascertained from the API Standards Department, telephone (202) 682-8000. A catalog of API publications and materials is published annually and updated quarterly by API, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.


Suggested revisions are invited and should be submitted to the Standards Department, API, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005, standards@api.org.


iii


Contents


Page

  1. Scope 1

    1. Purpose 1

    2. About this Document 1

    3. Supersedes Notice 1

  2. Normative References 1

  3. Terms, Definitions, and Acronyms 2

    1. Definitions 2

    2. Acronyms 3

  4. Considerations and General Concerns 4

    1. Carbon Steel Substitutions in Low-alloy Steel Systems 4

    2. Alloy Substitutions for Carbon Steel. 4

    3. Stainless Steel and Nonferrous Substitutions Within High-alloy Systems 4

    4. Residual Elements in Carbon Steels in Hydrofluoric Acid Alkylation Units 4

    5. Process Units Susceptible to Sulfidation 4

    6. Gasket Materials 5

    7. Refractory Installation Systems (Anchors) 5

  5. Material Verification Programs 5

    1. General 5

    2. Asset Components Included in a Material Verification Program 5

    3. Mill Test Reports and Usage in an MVP 6

    4. Roles and Responsibilities 6

    5. New Construction MVP 6

    6. Existing Installed Assets MVP 7

    7. MVP as an Element of Maintenance Systems 8

  6. PMI Methodology and Technology 10

    1. General 10

    2. MVP Test Method Objectives 10

    3. PMI Procedure 10

    4. Personnel Qualifications 10

    5. Chemical Analysis Techniques 10

    6. Sorting Analysis Techniques 11

    7. Spectrometer Technology 11

    8. Safety Issues 13

  7. Evaluation of Testing Results 14

    1. Material Acceptance Methods 14

    2. Follow-up PMI after Discovery of a Nonconformity 14

  8. Materials Identification 14

    1. Identification Process 14

    2. Color Coding/Marking 15

    3. Marking of Components 15

  9. Documentation and Recordkeeping 15

    1. Shop and Field PMI Documentation 15

    2. New and Existing Equipment or System Documentation 15

    3. PMI Records 15

v

Contents

Page

Annex A (informative) Statistical Terminology 17

Bibliography 18


vi


Guidelines for a Material Verification Program (MVP) for New and Existing Assets


  1. Scope


    1. Purpose


      The purpose of this recommended practice (RP) is to provide guidelines for an owner/user to develop and implement a material verification program (MVP) as part of an asset integrity program. The MVP uses positive material identification and other methods to verify that the nominal composition of an asset, an asset component, or weldment within the pressure envelope is consistent with the selected or specified construction materials.


      A well-designed and well-implemented MVP is an important management system used to minimize the potential for release of hazardous substances due to nonconforming materials of construction.


    2. About this Document


      This recommended practice provides the guidelines for material verification programs involving ferrous and nonferrous alloys during the construction, installation, maintenance, and inspection of new and existing process equipment. It applies to metallic materials purchased for use either directly by the owner/user or indirectly through distributors, fabricators, or contractors, and includes the supply, fabrication, and installation of these materials.


      This recommended practice is applicable to all refining and petrochemical industries, and may be applied in other industries and or businesses at the discretion of the owner/user. It is intended to be applied by any owner/user wishing to verify and/or validate that the materials of construction received, fabricated, and/or installed are in accordance with material and/or company specification(s).


    3. Supersedes Notice


      This version of API RP 578 (third edition) supersedes and wholly replaces the second edition (2010) of API RP 578 (Material Verification Program for New and Existing Alloy Piping Systems). The third edition contains many of the same paragraphs and language of the second edition, but it has been revised, reformatted, and re-visualized into a more encompassing document for all types of assets that may have an applicable material verification program.


  2. Normative References


    There are no documents considered to be normative for the application of this document. A bibliography can be found at the end of this document.


  3. Terms, Definitions, and Acronyms


    1. Definitions


3.1.1

alloy material

Any metallic material (including welding filler materials) that contains alloying elements, such as chromium, nickel, or molybdenum, that are intentionally added to enhance mechanical or physical properties and/or corrosion resistance. Alloys may be ferrous or nonferrous.